Call now on0800 051 8069
Read the latest success stories from the Dental Negligence team
A blog by Stephanie Cockburn discussing a recently settled orthodontic claim where damages of £17,000.00 were awarded. I recently acted for a client in relation to her orthodontic treatment with ceramic braces. Our client initially asked her dentist if it …
A blog by Stephanie Cockburn discussing a recently settled orthodontic claim where damages of £17,000.00 were awarded.
I recently acted for a client in relation to her orthodontic treatment with ceramic braces.
Our client initially asked her dentist if it was possible to change the appearance of her front veneers because she was unhappy that they were too long and too big generally: she wanted to see if they could be adjusted and made narrower and shorter to fit in more with her natural dentition.
Her dentist suggested that it was possible but in reducing the size of the veneers, space would be created between the teeth. Therefore, an orthodontist should be consulted to reduce such spacing before the veneers were provided.
Our client was referred to the Defendant orthodontist and a tick box questionnaire was completed. However, no clinical notes were made and the Defendant failed to acknowledge that our client’s main treatment aim was to replace her upper incisor veneers with shorter and narrower ones.
Furthermore, there were numerous failings involved in our client’s treatment planning and the consent process at the outset of her orthodontic treatment:
An OPG radiograph was obtained by our client’s dentist in her usual dental practice, which was disclosed to the Defendant, but no report was made on this, namely there was no reference to decay which should have been spotted in some upper molars.
A lateral cephalometric radiograph was not acquired, yet a skeletal discrepancy in the position of our client’s facial bones was recorded in the tick chart.
There were no study models taken for our client and no facial photographs were recorded.
Our client’s treatment plan merely suggested the use of ceramic brackets but:
Our client suffered substantially as a result of these failings on behalf of the Defendant Orthodontist. In particular, she suffered from the following injuries:
I represented our client and entered into negotiations to settle her claim with the Defendant before there was any need to progress her case through the formal litigation process.
It is very common for failings in orthodontic treatment to commence at the outset during the planning and consenting stage of a claim. However, unfortunately in our experience, failings do not stop at just the initial stages of orthodontic treatment and some of our clients have suffered from poor treatment throughout the duration of their braces, which can extend beyond into the retention phase and fitting of a retainer.
What types of failures are common in orthodontic type claims:
If you are concerned that you have experienced negligent orthodontic treatment, please speak with our specialist team today to find out if you are eligible for compensation.